Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Rights, Duties, and the Justice of Criminal Law

The debate surrounding treating juveniles as adults in certain cases in criminal law—be it indictment as an adult or being sent to an adult prison—misses the fundamental injustice of the thing: juveniles should not be treated as adults anymore than adults should be treated as juveniles.
Although the common law is less emphatic than the civil law on this point, physical persons are classified into different legal categories. Two such categories are minor (juvenile) and adult (major). With each of these categories come certain duties and corresponding rights. It is therefore unjust to attribute to a minor certain duties juridically attributable to an adult or to deprive him of certain rights juridically deprived of an adult.
With every duty comes a right. Hence  with the duty to follow the law and submit to adult punishment for its breach comes the right to vote, an active voice in society and a corresponding duty to behave for its good. But the minor does not have this right, nor a host of other rights, and therefore does not have the same obligation under the law to submit to the same degree of punishment. To impose a duty without granting a corresponding right is a contravention of justice.
Further, if a juvenile is capable of committing the same heinous crimes that an adult is capable of, and therefore has the same degree of rationality for the purposes of law, then the deprivation of suffrage to juveniles is thereby unjustifiable. The degree of one’s rationality under the law is an all-or-nothing category; adults are presumed to have greater rationality and are therefore accorded greater duties and rights, while juveniles and the mentally retarded are correspondingly accorded fewer duties and rights due to their diminished rational faculties.
It is patently unjust to categorize a person as an adult for the purposes of duty but as a juvenile for the purposes of right. A person is a person; he is either an adult or a juvenile. Justice does not recognize personal duality. Neither should law.
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment