Thursday, June 25, 2015

The Draft, Justice, and the Involuntary Deprivation of Constitutional Rights

The draft (especially the sex-selective draft) should be ruled unconstitutional. Reading the previous sentence, you’re probably thinking that I’m a gung-ho sexist draft dodger from the Vietnam era. Well, I’m not. Actually, I registered with the Selective Service on my 18th birthday as required by law, and the Vietnam era was before my time. It is not the draft per se that I have a problem with. It is the draft under the current legal framework.

Joining the military requires the forfeiture of certain rights and freedoms as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. This is required due to the necessities of a quasi-separate military society, a fully justified requirement when demanded of the freely enlisted. But when ordinary American males are required under penalty of law to enlist in the military and thereby required under penalty of law to forfeit their guaranteed rights under the Constitution, an injustice—both legal and moral—is done to American males.

I do not here advocate the abolition of the draft, but rather the protection of involuntary draftees' constitutional rights under military law. Ordinary civilian rights and freedoms should be enshrined in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for those soldiers who were involuntarily enlisted. Voluntarily enlisted soldiers, who thereby voluntarily temporarily forfeited certain constitutional rights and freedoms, would not need to be subject to such UCMJ protections in justice.

It may be objected that creating two fundamentally different gradations of military justice would cause a myriad of problems for the command structure as well as for the Judge Advocate General Corps (JAG) of the respective branches. It very likely would. But the alternative is not to involuntarily deprive ordinary American males of their constitutional rights and freedoms. Even felons receive due process of law when they are deprived of certain constitutional rights and freedoms, and they have irreparably wounded society! The ordinary American male deserves justice. The UCMJ must incorporate the protections of the Bill of Rights, or the draft must be permanently abolished. There is no alternative in justice or law.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Contract as Particular Law

A valid contract even has the status of a particular law among the contractors.[1] The contractors form a community ordered to a common end, the well-being and benefit of all involved in the contract. The members of the contractual community give their unanimous consent to the contract, and it thus has the legal character. For it is the will of the legislator, in this case the entire contractual community, solemnly expressed by means of the contractors formulation of the contract, it aims at the good of the entire contractual community over which it enjoins, and it is in accord with justice and reason insofar as it is a valid contract, for validity requires that it be in accordance with divine and natural law ad normam CLIF 12 §204, and if a statute does not violate these, it must needs be just. Therefore, since the contractors form a community, the whole people of such community has the right to make law for themselves, and this legislative right is properly exercised by means of contract, which thereby has the status of a particular law among the contractors.

(written circa April 2013)

[1] Post inspired by Lon L. Fuller, Anatomy of the Law
Cf. CLIF 12 §2

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

A Common Misstep of the Common Law

A judge is a servant of the law and not its master. The role of a judge is to apply the law in particular cases; the role of the Legislator is to create law for universal governance. The letter of the law is an expression of the spirit of the law, which is the intention of the Legislator. Thusly, although law is a composite of letter and spirit, the law is truly found in the spirit, which is known most directly by the Legislator. Therefore the authentic interpretation of the law is reserved to the Legislator, who knows to the fullest extent the spirit of the law, the most essential element of law of which the letter of the law is an expression (cf. CLIF 52 §101.2).